If a person is accustomed to getting something for free, can they unlearn that?
Is it unethical for me to tell a customer that I don't want to pay for their medicine, and that they can't get it?
Is it unethical for a country to tell it's citizens that they don't want to pay for their medicine?
Is it unethical for someone to make the decision to remove a pool of money from me, that I earned, in order to support a welfare class? A military project I'm opposed to? Spreading a doctrine that I don't believe in?
Should I not be the judge of the things that benefit me?
For Monica: What you say?
Itchy_turd - 3/12/2005 06:13:00 PM
Unless they are disabled, widowed (or widowered), elderly, or a child, I believe they should have to pay. I apply this rule to most welfare related benefits (some exceptions, such as college grants to state/community colleges).
To answer your questions:
Yes, but not like it.
No, and if they are not one of the above, tell then to get a job.
If one of the above, yes. If not, no.
Actually, no, because we will never all agree on what to spend it on. Luckily, when we vote we can usually tell what to expect from the person/party we are voting for. Just hope the guy you dislike the least wins.
No, that's the governments job. Just vote and cross your fingers.
:)
- 3/13/2005 02:33:00 PM
being as how I now exactly how you feel and exactly waht you go thru every day as i am going thru it with you everyone should have to pay something shold it be one penny besides " I WAnt my two dollars!!!!" cute movie
Itchy_turd - 3/14/2005 01:41:00 AM
Itchy_turd - 3/14/2005 01:43:00 AM
I don't think I could have made any "one-forty-four-word-sentence-without-any-punctuation-except-in-a-quote" that summed it up better than that.
The above poster pointed out another reason why our country is so great:
Even if you have the grammar of a kindergartner, then when he turns 18 in a few more years then he will still be able to vote.
|
|
