112358437189887641562819
224617865279775382134729
33696639
448325731459551674268549
551674268549448325731459
66393369
775382134729224617865279
887641562819112358437189
9
- 5/16/2006 10:53:00 AM
9,9,18,27,45,72,117,189,306,495,801,1296,2097,3393,5490,8883,14373.. hope that's enough
Itchy_turd - 5/16/2006 07:09:00 PM
Yes, but Chuck's pattern would involve taking the 2-digit sums and adding both digits together into a sum of one digit, then adding that to the previous sum to determine the next number in the pattern.
And the digits of any number that's a factor of 9 can always be added together to result in 9.
Chuck - 5/16/2006 08:20:00 PM
Sharp Jordan. I ended it when the pattern repeated and truncated the starting zero.
Come back next week and view the excitement as I do the same thing in base 60. (yeah right)
- 5/31/2006 09:53:00 AM
Yeah, I'll be honest, I didn't know what it was untill I saw it on the site and researched. I did it the way the web-site I visited explained it to me. after posting I realized the code didn't look quite right, and then said "F*%K it".
Dave
- 6/13/2006 08:34:00 AM
So I was playing with fibernache numbers and numerology and noticed a pattern of 24 repeating digits. The second line is the same doubled and numerologically reduced again. All the subsequent longer lines seem to be repeats for the previous long line, but what are the short lines?
Why is there this pattern of 24 repeating numbers anyway? What about base ten and the fibernachi numbers makes this happen?
Chuck - 6/13/2006 11:20:00 AM
I have no answer. It's my experience that reducing any logical sequence down to a single digit (which is what I'm assuming you mean by numerology) gives rise to a pattern.
This is not unique to base 10 either. If you like I could repeat the same thing in bases 9-5. The sequence would get longer. I wonder at what base the sequence would be the shortest?
If you enjoy bizzare math (and people who can explain it better than I) check out Curious Math.
- 6/13/2006 03:38:00 PM
I just can't figure out why its 24. seems odd.
Chuck - 6/14/2006 01:13:00 AM
What kind of a math person would I be if I didn't answer this? Not a very good one.
|
|
